CIF INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION

العقيدة الإسلامية الصحيحة

 

 

 Sacred Muslim Sites Destroyed

To Create Hotels and Public Toilets

 

 

Historic and culturally important landmarks are being destroyed to make way for luxury hotels and malls, reports Jerome Taylor - Saturday, September 24, 2011.

 

According to an article in the Independent, urbanisation projects for the redevelopment of Mecca are responsible for the destruction of many sites sacred to Muslims. The following are the next to feel the brunt of the demolition crews:

Bayt al-Mawlid

When the Wahabis took Mecca in the 1920s they destroyed the dome on top of the house where the Prophet Mohammed was born. It was thenused as a cattle market before being turned into a library after a campaign by Meccans. There are concerns that the expansion of the Grand Mosque will destroy it once more. The site has never been excavated by archaeologists.

Ottoman and Abasi columns of the Grand Mosque

Slated for demolition as part of the Grand Mosque expansion, these intricately carved columns date back to the 17th century and are the oldest surviving sections of Islam’s holiest site. Much to the chagrin of Wahabis, they are inscribed with the names of the Prophet’s companions. Ottomon Mecca is now rapidly disappearing

Al-Masjid al-Nawabi

For many years, hardline Wahabi clerics have had their sites set on the 15th century green dome that rests above the tomb holding the Prophet, Abu Bakr and Umar in Medina. The mosque is regarded as the second holiest site in Islam. Wahabis, however, believe marked graves are idolatrous. A pamphlet published in 2007 by the Saudi Ministry of Islamic Affairs, endorsed by Abdulaziz Al Sheikh, the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia, stated that “the green dome shall be demolished and the three graves flattened in the Prophet’s Masjid”.

Jabal al-Nour

A mountain outside Mecca where Mohammed received his first Koranic revelations. The Prophet used to spend long spells in a cave called Hira. The cave is particularly popular among South Asian pilgrims who have carved steps up to its entrance and adorned the walls with graffiti. Religious hardliners are keen to dissuade pilgrims from congregating there and have mooted the idea of removing the steps and even destroying the mountain altogether.

The only countries which have gone on record to protest the wholesale destruction of these sites are Turkey and Iran. Western criticism of Saudis is often avoided by because nobody wants to see their lucrative contracts dry out. South Asians rarely criticise Saudis because Arabs, in general, are considered to be the pinnacle of the Islamic cultural and spiritual food-chains.

“No one has the balls to stand up and condemn this cultural vandalism,” says Dr Irfan al-Alawi who, as executive director of the Islamic Heritage Research Foundation, has fought in vain to protect his country’s historical sites. “We have already lost 400-500 sites. I just hope it’s not too late to turn things around.”

Sami Angawi, a renowned Saudi expert on the region’s Islamic architecture, is equally concerned. “This is an absolute contradiction to the nature of Mecca and the sacredness of the house of God,” he told the Reuters news agency earlier this year. “Both [Mecca and Medina] are historically almost finished. You do not find anything except skyscrapers.”

The Saud family, who are Wahhabis, have a long history of desecration and destruction of the sites.

In the eyes of Wahabis, historical sites and shrines encourage “shirq” – the sin of idolatry or polytheism – and should be destroyed. When the al-Saud tribes swept through Mecca in the 1920s, the first thing they did was lay waste to cemeteries holding many of Islam’s important figures. They have been destroying the country’s heritage ever since. Of the three sites the Saudis have allowed the UN to designate World Heritage Sites, none are related to Islam.

So you see, destruction of sites which might lead to grave veneration is “idolatory” but putting the tallest clock tower in the world on top of a Las-Vegas style building as a modern Temple of Mammon dedicated to the God of Bling is perfectly pious.

And let’s not forget that it is the ordinary Saudis who have to pay for the excesses of the Saudi Royal Family:

Non-Muslims cannot visit Mecca and Medina, but The Independent was able to interview a number of citizens who expressed discontent over the way their town was changing. One young woman whose father recently had his house bulldozed described how her family was still waiting for compensation. “There was very little warning; they just came and told him that the house had to be bulldozed,” she said.

Another Meccan added: “If a prince of a member of the royal family wants to extend his palace he just does it. No one talks about it in public though. There’s such a climate of fear.”

This is the same “royal family” which bankrolls Jamaat-e-Islam in South Asia and their fronts in the UK, particularly the East London Mosque and the London Muslim Centre and Islamic Forum Europe.

Courtesy - Al Spittoon

 

 

السلام عليكم و رحمة الله و بركاته

Translate Website